- From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:30:28 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
- Cc: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 10 Nov 2014, at 16:54, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> wrote: >> 2. It may also be that you want to encourage Web sites to add XSD datatype information to schema.org properties. This will not work, IMO, because >> a) this is impossible in Microdata syntax (no datatype at instance level) > > Not entirely true, a conforming Microdata to RDF processor will output a matching @datetime or element content value for a <time> element as a typed literal using the matching xsd datatype. What Google does, however, may be different. > > Gregg > Yes, <time> is a special case. But also note the complexity of that special case: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Time_element. Not sure whether there is a 1:1 match to xsd datatypes. Martin
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 14:30:56 UTC