- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 07:58:07 -0800
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- CC: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html is providing less and less of schema.org. It doesn't include the -input and -output properties of potential actions. It doesn't include the changes to domains and ranges that the addition of Role makes. peter PS: Is the ability to use strings as the values for -input and -output properties part of "strings as things"? On 11/03/2014 05:29 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 3 November 2014 05:17, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The scripts may still scrape parts of schema.org properly, but given all >>>> the activity in the past three years, I would not recommend to use >>>> http://schema.rdfs.org/ for serious projects without a careful investigation >>>> first. >>> >>> Thanks for the heads-up. As far as alternative approaches: >>> >>> A. Update the scrapers and scrapings >> >> >> No need for scrappers anymore. Schema.org publishes structured data on all >> its type and property pages, and the whole schema is available as RDFa at >> http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html. It's only a matter of >> converting it to your favorite format using a local tool or a service like >> http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/ or http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller. > > http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html should be reasonably good > (since it is the master file that the entire site is built from). The > per-term RDFa is I think not yet perfected, but it is good to know > people find value in it. > > Also http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html contains a few > equivalentProperty and equivalentClass mappings to other vocabularies > where a simple obvious mapping exists. These are currently reflected > into the (not shown to humans) RDFa per-term markup. For e.g. in > source code of http://schema.org/Dataset > > <div id="mainContent" vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="rdfs:Class" > resource="http://schema.org/Dataset"> > <link property="owl:equivalentClass" href="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#Dataset"/> > <link property="owl:equivalentClass" > href="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Dataset"/> > <link property="owl:equivalentClass" > href="http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#Dataset"/>... > > If there are more such mappings available, do please feel free to file > a bug in github with details, or a pull request, and we'll try to get > more into the site. > > cheers, > > Dan
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 15:58:40 UTC