Re: schema.org v1.5: tweaks and fixes

Thanks.  Much appreciated, Dan.

David


On 5/27/2014 9:45 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 27 May 2014 15:39, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>> Previous update:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014May/0169.html
>>
>> Schema.org has just been updated to revision 1.5.
>>
>> Main changes:
>>
>> 1. Tweaked definition of 'keywords' to indicate that comma-separated
>> entries are expected.
>>
>> See http://schema.org/CreativeWork  http://schema.org/keywords
>> "Keywords or tags used to describe this content. Multiple entries in a
>> keywords list are typically delimited by commas." (as suggested by
>> Stéphane, Dan and others)
>>
>> Discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014May/0188.html
>>
>> 2. 13 typo fixes from Stephane.
>>
>> e.g. 'primarly' for 'primarily' in
>> http://schema.org/DiagnosticProcedure,  'Enerygy' for 'Energy' in
>> http://schema.org/Energy etc.
>>
>> 3. Adding a new icaoCode text-valued property for http://schema.org/Airport
>>
>> http://schema.org/icaoCode "IACO identifier for an airport." as
>> suggested by Hayden Read, Tom Morris and others.
>>
>> Discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014May/0166.html
>>
>> 4. Updated the description for http://schema.org/flightNumber
>>
>> Old: "The unique identifier for a flight."
>> New: "The unique identifier for a flight, not including the airline IATA code.
>> For example, if describing United flight 110, the flightNumber is '110'.
>> The IATA code can be set on the Airline."
>>
>> 5. Added missing Actions-related definitions (urlTemplate, valueName)
>>
>> Definitions for http://schema.org/urlTemplate and
>> http://schema.org/valueName were missing,
>> although they were included in the general overview specification
>> recently agreed for Actions.
>> See also http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ActivityActions
> I missed one:
>
> 6. Added http://schema.org/dissolutionDate to Organization
> so that we have http://schema.org/dissolutionDate "The date that this
> organization was dissolved."
> alongside the existing http://schema.org/foundingDate "The date that
> this organization was founded."
>
> As suggested in https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/dissolutionDate and
> elsewhere.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>> Many thanks to all involved,
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> for schema.org.