- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:23:35 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU3jgczqguXRow=RogKBBm2QoZqZxuH8kVUMBmzYH2fqCA@mail.gmail.com>
or: <body itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/CollectionPage"> <link itemprop="about" href="https://www.freebase.com/m/03lty"> <div itemprop="mainContentOfPage" itemscope itemtype=" http://schema.org/ItemList"> [...] </div> </body> 2014-05-20 19:19 GMT+02:00 Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>: > OK, that markup surprises me (probable has more to do with me). > > I always imagined writing something like: > > <body itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ItemPage"> > <link itemprop="about" href="https://www.freebase.com/m/0crgbp8"> > > <div itemprop="mainContentOfPage" itemscope itemtype=" > http://schema.org/Product"> > [...] > </div> > </body> > > > 2014-05-20 19:01 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>: > > On 20 May 2014 17:30, Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com> wrote: >> > I think you buried the lede in the github link at the bottom. :) >> ( https://gist.github.com/anonymous/cf7e24f6378b176aa010 ) >> >> Ok, let's jump into the markup. It does flush out some issues - >> >> >> > In terms of markup would it be reasonable to do this? >> >> Slight tweaks (discussing hashes and slashes with Dan Scott and >> Stephane Corlosquet in IRC...): >> >> <html vocab="http://schema.org/"> >> <head> >> <link property="about" href="#main_item"/> >> </head> >> <body> >> <div resource="#main_item" typeof="MusicEvent"> >> ... >> </div> >> </body> >> </html> >> >> (this adds a '/' in the @vocab url, and # within @resource attribute) >> >> > and rely on an implicit WebPage subject? >> >> Looks fine from RDFa point of view. Even though "implicit WebPage" is >> a schema.org convention, generic RDFa 1.1 parsing would attach the >> 'about' property to the default base URL, which would be the page. >> >> As for Microdata I'm not sure the best pattern, but this with more >> RDFa-ish structure in the <head> might be bearable: >> >> <html> >> <head> >> <link rel="http://schema.org/about" href="#main_item"/> >> </head> >> <body> >> <div id="main_item" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/MusicEvent >> "> >> ... >> </div> >> </body> >> </html> >> >> >> FWIW another everything in the body pattern that works for RDFa (but >> dips into RDFa 1.1 beyond the Lite subset) is: >> >> <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Person"> >> <link rev="about" href=""/> >> <span property="name">John Smith</span> >> </div> >> >> Which brings me to another issue that's never far away - we have a lot >> of ways of saying quite similar but different things(*): >> >> <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Person"> >> <link rel="url sameAs officialWebPage" rev="about" href=""/> >> <span property="name">John Smith</span> >> </div> >> >> At least this is pretty compact markup, but we owe the world an >> account of how at least 'url', 'sameAs' and 'about' interact. >> >> e.g. for any x, y where x--sameAs-->y, is y--about-->x going to be true? >> >> sameAs's definition: "URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously >> indicates the item's identity. E.g. the URL of the item's Wikipedia >> page, Freebase page, or official website." ... which covers the >> official website use case. >> >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> (*) officialWebPage is used by Yandex e.g. see >> http://help.yandex.com/webmaster/supported-schemas/review-car.xml but >> similar ideas surfaced here in the social/profile/account discussion >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 17:24:03 UTC