- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:19:50 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU0vUj5DfcSv5Optm8Lo5k7+HWwOf9Y41RESVm-KRU_8AA@mail.gmail.com>
OK, that markup surprises me (probable has more to do with me). I always imagined writing something like: <body itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ItemPage"> <link itemprop="about" href="https://www.freebase.com/m/0crgbp8"> <div itemprop="mainContentOfPage" itemscope itemtype=" http://schema.org/Product"> [...] </div> </body> 2014-05-20 19:01 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>: > On 20 May 2014 17:30, Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com> wrote: > > I think you buried the lede in the github link at the bottom. :) > ( https://gist.github.com/anonymous/cf7e24f6378b176aa010 ) > > Ok, let's jump into the markup. It does flush out some issues - > > > > In terms of markup would it be reasonable to do this? > > Slight tweaks (discussing hashes and slashes with Dan Scott and > Stephane Corlosquet in IRC...): > > <html vocab="http://schema.org/"> > <head> > <link property="about" href="#main_item"/> > </head> > <body> > <div resource="#main_item" typeof="MusicEvent"> > ... > </div> > </body> > </html> > > (this adds a '/' in the @vocab url, and # within @resource attribute) > > > and rely on an implicit WebPage subject? > > Looks fine from RDFa point of view. Even though "implicit WebPage" is > a schema.org convention, generic RDFa 1.1 parsing would attach the > 'about' property to the default base URL, which would be the page. > > As for Microdata I'm not sure the best pattern, but this with more > RDFa-ish structure in the <head> might be bearable: > > <html> > <head> > <link rel="http://schema.org/about" href="#main_item"/> > </head> > <body> > <div id="main_item" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/MusicEvent > "> > ... > </div> > </body> > </html> > > > FWIW another everything in the body pattern that works for RDFa (but > dips into RDFa 1.1 beyond the Lite subset) is: > > <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Person"> > <link rev="about" href=""/> > <span property="name">John Smith</span> > </div> > > Which brings me to another issue that's never far away - we have a lot > of ways of saying quite similar but different things(*): > > <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Person"> > <link rel="url sameAs officialWebPage" rev="about" href=""/> > <span property="name">John Smith</span> > </div> > > At least this is pretty compact markup, but we owe the world an > account of how at least 'url', 'sameAs' and 'about' interact. > > e.g. for any x, y where x--sameAs-->y, is y--about-->x going to be true? > > sameAs's definition: "URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously > indicates the item's identity. E.g. the URL of the item's Wikipedia > page, Freebase page, or official website." ... which covers the > official website use case. > > > Dan > > > > (*) officialWebPage is used by Yandex e.g. see > http://help.yandex.com/webmaster/supported-schemas/review-car.xml but > similar ideas surfaced here in the social/profile/account discussion > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 17:20:23 UTC