Re: Schema.org site update - fixed examples

Hello,

I was having trouble with the syntax verification for the JSON-LD examples
on the URL http://schema.org/Action.

Unless I am missing something, I believe an extra { at the top after the
following line will produce a small fix that may help some future headaches:


   1. <script type="application/ld+json">
   2. {
   3.   "@context": "http://schema.org",
   4.   "@type": "ListenAction",
   5.   "agent": {
   6.     "@type": "Person",
   7.     "name": "John"
   8.   },
   9.   "object": {
   10.     "@type": "MusicGroup",
   11.     "name": "Pink!"
   12.   },
   13.   "participant": {
   14.     "@type": "Person",
   15.     "name": "Steve"
   16.   },
   17.   "location": {
   18.     "@type": "Residence",
   19.     "name": "Ann's apartment"
   20.   },
   21.   "instrument": {
   22.     "@type": "Product",
   23.     "name": "iPod"
   24.   }
   25. }

   1. </script>

   Best Regards,

Mark Keller


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote:

> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:33 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> > Just to let you know that we've fixed the problem we were having with
> > the new schema.org site not displaying all examples.
> >
> > http://schema.org/BusReservation
> > http://schema.org/Action
> > http://schema.org/Question etc.
> >
> > ... all show tabbed examples, even when one of the formats is not
> > available. It is not the most graceful of approaches but it meets the
> > immediate goal of bringing all examples back online.
> >
> > Also noted: we currently show '// comments' in the JSON-LD, although
> > this is not strictly JSON. We'll find a better solution in future.
>
> IMO, the simplest thing would be to move those comments into a
> "description" property.
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>