- From: Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 17:36:01 +0100
- To: Yuliya Tikhokhod <tilid@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E6D2957E-5EE5-42E6-A702-3E822D217225@ostephens.com>
RolePlayingGame seems specific while at least some of the properties (min/max players at the very least) seem common to other types of game. Would it make more sense to simply have /Game as a creative work? Owen Stephens Owen Stephens Consulting Web: http://www.ostephens.com Email: owen@ostephens.com Telephone: 0121 288 6936 On 15 May 2014, at 11:48, Yuliya Tikhokhod <tilid@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > This is proposal from Yandex (one of the schema.org sponsors). > > There are many sites dedicated to games (for example, http://store.steampowered.com/app/244850/, http://www.gamespot.com/eve-online/, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.zeptolab.ctr2.f2p.google). They contain some specific information, for which we have no specific classes and properties in schema.org. > > We made separate class for game as a creative work (with complicated rules, characters, narrative). And called it RolePlayingGame. Maybe this is not a very good name and we will be thankful if you suggest better name for class describing games with complicated rules, fictional characters and specific locations. > Then VideoGame class is a child of two parents - RolePlayingGame and SoftwareApplication. > > We also added some additional properties to SoftwareApplication class. > > This is test build of schema.org with this proposal > http://sdo-yavg.appspot.com/VideoGame > http://sdo-yavg.appspot.com/RolePlayingGame > http://sdo-yavg.appspot.com/OnlineGame > http://sdo-yavg.appspot.com/SoftwareApplication > > In attachment you can find pdf version of this proposal > > -- > Yuliya Tikhokhod > > Yandex > > <VideoGame.pdf>
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 16:36:32 UTC