- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 11:37:49 -0700
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'W3C Web Schemas Task Force' <public-vocabs@w3.org>
+1 On 05/04/2014 01:28 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >[...] > > There are already hundreds of concepts defined by schema.org, > yet only a very small fraction of them results in concrete benefits for the > data *provider*. What's the motivation for them to use this approach? I bet > it would be much easier to convince them to, e.g., publish their data as > plain-old JSON instead (not JSON-LD). That's extremely cheap and every > programmer is familiar with it. You also get more or less the same benefits, > i.e., structured data that you claim is easier to interpret than completely > unstructured, natural language. So why not just embed JSON blocks. In most > programming//templating languages that wouldn't require more than one line > of code. > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > >
Received on Sunday, 4 May 2014 18:38:20 UTC