-1 The problem addressed by Martin Hepp is something schema.org applications at Google face. So, yes, it will find use. guha On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider < pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On 05/04/2014 01:28 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > >> [...] >> >> >> There are already hundreds of concepts defined by schema.org, >> yet only a very small fraction of them results in concrete benefits for >> the >> data *provider*. What's the motivation for them to use this approach? I >> bet >> it would be much easier to convince them to, e.g., publish their data as >> plain-old JSON instead (not JSON-LD). That's extremely cheap and every >> programmer is familiar with it. You also get more or less the same >> benefits, >> i.e., structured data that you claim is easier to interpret than >> completely >> unstructured, natural language. So why not just embed JSON blocks. In most >> programming//templating languages that wouldn't require more than one line >> of code. >> >> >> -- >> Markus Lanthaler >> @markuslanthaler >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 4 May 2014 19:57:48 UTC