- From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:18:12 -0400
- To: Albert Willis <alwillis@mac.com>
- Cc: W3C public vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOr1obG5vaCOCODR5yW+7ho4bs0Wfw+WdbH9pVGF_g2yVh70bA@mail.gmail.com>
I think you have stumbled on some holes in what schema.org can offer. Specifically, schema.org has no way to model physical accessibility, which is a shame. It would be nice to get a working group together for this issue. - Vicki Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Albert Willis <alwillis@mac.com> wrote: > Working on a project and I need to markup meetings of community members of > a city or neighborhood to address a civic issue and nothing in > http://schema.org/Event fits. > > Ideally, I’d like a version of Event with the following changes: > > > - instead of a performer, it would be a convener (or host) which would > be a Person or Organization > - instead of workPerformed, it would be issuesToAddress (something > that’s not a CreativeWork) > - markup to indicate if an RSVP is required > - a contactPoint for the meeting (like we see in > http://schema.org/Organization) for RSVPs or additional information > - markup for amenities offered (food, child care) to make it more > convenient for people to attend > - should be able to specify whether the location has affordances for > people in wheelchairs, etc. > - should be able to indicate if there will be translation available > for non-native speakers > - should be able to indicate whether sign language for deaf people > will be available > > > Most of the meetings I attend are hosted by ad hoc or temporary entities > (committees, working groups, etc.) that aren’t formal Organizations, so the > http://schema.org/Organization markup doesn’t work well for that either, > but that’s another issue. > > In the short term, any suggestions for a combination of markup I could use > to indicate some of these attributes? > > Longer term, I’m happy to participate in a process for new schema.org > vocabulary to address these issues. > > Thanks. > > > — Al > > > --- > Al Willis > alwillis@mac.com >
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 15:18:39 UTC