- From: Jason Johnson (BING) <jasjoh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:22:46 +0000
- To: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- CC: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <58bf74fa23e84b9db7cddeba092d7103@DM2PR03MB479.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Because it’s too vague. We have multiple ‘providers’ within the scope of a given scenario like a travel reservation + a separate meaning within the scope of a CreativeWork. It would be too confusing to have a single description for ‘provider’ with a bunch of “… if you use it in this scenario it means this, but if you use it in this scenario it means this ..” From: Jarno van Driel [mailto:jarnovandriel@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:15 PM To: Wallis,Richard Cc: Karen Coyle; <public-vocabs@w3.org> Subject: Re: offeredBy to supersede vendor, merchant, provider, seller, …? Might I ask why a new @serviceProvider property? Why not just leave it at @provider? 2014-06-17 22:39 GMT+02:00 Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org<mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>>: I was just taking and tweaking a bit the current description of provider: “The person or organization providing the service, reservation, or creative work. The provider may subcontract out the service.” ~Richard On 17 Jun 2014, at 20:46, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote: Richard, can you explain what the 'subcontract' bit is about? Are you saying that one should encode the provider, not the subcontractor? My gut feeling is that knowing who has subcontracted to whom may be a bridge too far, so maybe provider should just be... who you wish to call the provider. kc On 6/17/14, 10:42 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote: Maybe “The person or organization providing the service, item, product, reservation, or creative work. The provider may subcontract out the supply of such.” - would be fractionally better. ~Richard On 17 Jun 2014, at 18:40, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org<mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> <mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>> wrote: Building on your suggestions, I would be tempted to change the description of ‘provider' to “The person or organization providing the service, item, reservation, or creative work. The provider may subcontract out the supply of such.”, -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet -- Jarno van Driel Technical & Semantic SEO Consultant 8 Digits - Digital Marketing Technologies Tel: +31 652 847 608 Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JarnovanDriel Linkedin: linkedin.com/pub/jarno-van-driel/75/470/36a/<http://linkedin.com/pub/jarno-van-driel/75/470/36a/>
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 16:23:34 UTC