Re: Music schema proposal

Vicki,

1. It looks like on http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicComposition there is
a wrongful expected type for the musicArrangement property ?  Instead of it
expecting a musicComposition, should it expect an AlbumRelease ?  Looks
like a typo error or something...

2. It seems that trackNumber on MusicComposition might be the wrong place
for that property ?  But then It seems like the intent for MusicComposition
is to encapsulate the idea of a "Song" and in that case, to easily cluster
together multiple recordings of the same work (a MusicComposition) by the
same artist ?  But if that is the case the schema does not currently fit
into that mold.  Can you explain why trackNumber is on MusicComposition ?

-- 
-Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
wrote:

> Sites like www.musicbrainz.org provide a wealth of information about
> music artists and recordings, but the sparseness of music-related
> schema.org schema limits the ability for these sites to fully describe
> their data. The following proposal for new music-related properties and
> types was developed through collaboration with the MusicBrainz project and
> partially inspired by the MusicBrainz and Music Ontology schemas.
>
> Some work remains to synchronize with the proposal out of the Bib Extend
> Community group. In the meantime, please see the attached PDF or the test
> build pages:
> http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicComposition
> http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicGroup
> http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicAlbum
> http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicRecording
> http://sdo-music.appspot.com/StudioAlbum
> http://sdo-music.appspot.com/AlbumRelease
>
> - Vicki
>
> Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
>
>