- From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:20:48 -0400
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 18:21:15 UTC
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. It looks like on http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicComposition there > is a wrongful expected type for the musicArrangement property ? Instead of > it expecting a musicComposition, should it expect an AlbumRelease ? Looks > like a typo error or something... > The description should have been "an arrangement derived from this Composition". > > 2. It seems that trackNumber on MusicComposition might be the wrong place > for that property ? But then It seems like the intent for MusicComposition > is to encapsulate the idea of a "Song" and in that case, to easily cluster > together multiple recordings of the same work (a MusicComposition) by the > same artist ? But if that is the case the schema does not currently fit > into that mold. Can you explain why trackNumber is on MusicComposition ? > The trackNumber property was for MusicRecording, not MusicComposition. These should be fixed on the test site soon. - Vicki Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 18:21:15 UTC