- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:06:35 +0200
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU0x0bgPDNSR7eBseqbpMJfeH5L9iw1ujkqaDBoywA9VuA@mail.gmail.com>
And how about using @category within an Offer to express this? Something like: <div itemid="tour-operator" itemscope itemtype=" http://schema.org/Organization"> <link itemprop="additionalType" href=" http://www.productontology.org/id/Tour_operator" /> <span itemprop="name">Acme holidays</span> <span itemprop="makesOffer" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Offer"> <span itemid="business-function" itemprop="businessFunction" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/BusinessFunction"> <link itemprop="url" href="http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#ProvideService"> <link itemprop="category" href="http://www.freebase.com/m/07bxq" /> </span> </span> </div> 2014-06-07 9:40 GMT+02:00 Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>: > Hi Thad, > > Sounds like a good idea. > > How about seeking a relation to the W3C Organization Ontology [1] (as well > as Freebase, of course, if it brings more to the table). For this specific > matter, would either 'purpose' [2] or 'classification' [3] be applicable? > > (By "seeking a relation", I (as usual) specifically mean cherry-picking > terms from existing vocabularies, possibly relabel the imports to fit the > scema.org naming scheme, and explicitly linking the two using RDFS and/or > OWL in the RDF description of schema.org, to document this relation > precisely, thus enabling humans and simpler machines alike to connect the > dots.) > > Cheers, > Niklas > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ > [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#org:purpose > [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#org:classification > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> You cannot say Organizations are in or about a "Class of Thing". The >> Organization is in a Competitive Space ...or an Organization Sector... like >> "Human Rights"... "Animal Training" ... "A/C Repair Services" ... etc. >> >> Freebase has all of these, btw. >> >> I just quickly found out within our beloved Schema.org. We do NOT have >> an property called Organization Sector, like Freebase does, nor anything >> close to that to say "This org is in the business of...this org deals >> primarily with...this org mostly sells products concerning the subject >> of...." >> >> And that just bites and also makes it nearly impossible to easily say >> that an Organization or Website sells products in a particular >> category(sector) like Baby & Toddler ... or Pets (Animals) .. or Mufflers >> ... or A/C ... or provides services in the sector of "Physical Therapy" ... >> while not having to create thousands of sub-Types unnecessarily, like >> "Physical Therapist", "Muffler Shop", etc. >> >> We need an easy path like Organization Sector, to say that an >> Organization deals mostly with products or services in a particular sector >> or subject, if you will. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> -- >> -Thad >> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> >> > > -- *Jarno van Driel* Technical & Semantic SEO Consultant 8 Digits - Digital Marketing Technologies Tel: +31 652 847 608 Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JarnovanDriel Linkedin: linkedin.com/pub/jarno-van-driel/75/470/36a/
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2014 10:07:06 UTC