- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:15:34 +0200
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU037mJbrSVTBc+SxrKxypvGNnHf3yy+bSAjve4G9NC2zA@mail.gmail.com>
oops, I nested the category wrong: <div itemid="tour-operator" itemscope itemtype=" http://schema.org/Organization"> <link itemprop="additionalType" href=" http://www.productontology.org/id/Tour_operator" /> <span itemprop="name">Acme holidays</span> <span itemprop="makesOffer" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Offer"> <span itemid="business-function" itemprop="businessFunction" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/BusinessFunction"> <link itemprop="url" href="http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#ProvideService"> </span> <link itemprop="category" href="http://www.freebase.com/m/07bxq" /> </span> </div> 2014-06-07 12:06 GMT+02:00 Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>: > And how about using @category within an Offer to express this? > > Something like: > <div itemid="tour-operator" itemscope itemtype=" > http://schema.org/Organization"> > <link itemprop="additionalType" href=" > http://www.productontology.org/id/Tour_operator" /> > <span itemprop="name">Acme holidays</span> > <span itemprop="makesOffer" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Offer"> > <span itemid="business-function" itemprop="businessFunction" itemscope > itemtype="http://schema.org/BusinessFunction"> > <link itemprop="url" href=" > http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#ProvideService"> > <link itemprop="category" href="http://www.freebase.com/m/07bxq" /> > </span> > </span> > </div> > > > 2014-06-07 9:40 GMT+02:00 Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>: > > Hi Thad, >> >> Sounds like a good idea. >> >> How about seeking a relation to the W3C Organization Ontology [1] (as >> well as Freebase, of course, if it brings more to the table). For this >> specific matter, would either 'purpose' [2] or 'classification' [3] be >> applicable? >> >> (By "seeking a relation", I (as usual) specifically mean cherry-picking >> terms from existing vocabularies, possibly relabel the imports to fit the >> scema.org naming scheme, and explicitly linking the two using RDFS >> and/or OWL in the RDF description of schema.org, to document this >> relation precisely, thus enabling humans and simpler machines alike to >> connect the dots.) >> >> Cheers, >> Niklas >> >> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ >> [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#org:purpose >> [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#org:classification >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> You cannot say Organizations are in or about a "Class of Thing". The >>> Organization is in a Competitive Space ...or an Organization Sector... like >>> "Human Rights"... "Animal Training" ... "A/C Repair Services" ... etc. >>> >>> Freebase has all of these, btw. >>> >>> I just quickly found out within our beloved Schema.org. We do NOT have >>> an property called Organization Sector, like Freebase does, nor anything >>> close to that to say "This org is in the business of...this org deals >>> primarily with...this org mostly sells products concerning the subject >>> of...." >>> >>> And that just bites and also makes it nearly impossible to easily say >>> that an Organization or Website sells products in a particular >>> category(sector) like Baby & Toddler ... or Pets (Animals) .. or Mufflers >>> ... or A/C ... or provides services in the sector of "Physical Therapy" ... >>> while not having to create thousands of sub-Types unnecessarily, like >>> "Physical Therapist", "Muffler Shop", etc. >>> >>> We need an easy path like Organization Sector, to say that an >>> Organization deals mostly with products or services in a particular sector >>> or subject, if you will. >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> >>> -- >>> -Thad >>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >>> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> >>> >> >> > > > -- > *Jarno van Driel* > Technical & Semantic SEO Consultant > 8 Digits - Digital Marketing Technologies > > Tel: +31 652 847 608 > Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JarnovanDriel > Linkedin: linkedin.com/pub/jarno-van-driel/75/470/36a/ > -- *Jarno van Driel* Technical & Semantic SEO Consultant 8 Digits - Digital Marketing Technologies Tel: +31 652 847 608 Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JarnovanDriel Linkedin: linkedin.com/pub/jarno-van-driel/75/470/36a/
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2014 10:16:01 UTC