- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 22:20:33 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU27JW8EwFdgyt=rjAW8bcZJXj40a21G9mDoYYmrk8eiAg@mail.gmail.com>
Personally I most of all like the addition of WebSite (and it's creative example) as well as the reworked 'isPartOf' most and I've already started to implementing them. :-) But I would have been an even happier camper if 'hasPart' would have been introduced as well. And even though chaining WebSite > WebPage > WebPageElements > CreativeWork now can be achieved, without abusing 'mentions' for this, it unfortunately is quite cumbersome in microdata because one has to use itemid quite a lot, eg: <body itemid="#WebPage" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage"> <nav itemid="#SiteNavigationElement" itemscope itemtype=" http://schema.org/SiteNavigationElement"> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#WebPage"> <ul> <li itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage" itemid="#WebPage-1"> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#SiteNavigationElement"> <a itemprop="url" href="[some-page-url]"> <span itemprop="name">[some-page-name]</span> </a> <ul> <li itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage"> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#WebPage-1" /> <a itemprop="url" href="[some-page-url]"> <span itemprop="name">[some-page-name]</span> </a> </li> <li itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage"> <link itemprop="isPartOf" href="#WebPage-1" /> <a itemprop="url" href="[some-page-url]"> <span itemprop="name">[some-page-name]</span> </a> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </nav> </body> I'm still quite pleased with the update is as though. 2014-07-28 17:43 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>: > previous update (1.7), > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jul/0012.html > > A small schema.org update just went live: > > 1. We add a new CreativeWork type, "WebSite" > > http://schema.org/WebSite > > "A WebSite is a set of related web pages and other items typically > served from a single web domain and accessible via URLs." > > The example shows the use of this with SearchAction. > > 2. We adopt the proposal made by the bibextend group and other > collaborators, to broaden isPartOf. It now relates any CreativeWork to > any other CreativeWork > > http://schema.org/isPartOf > > see also > https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Periodicals,_Articles_and_Multi-volume_Works > > 3. Potential Actions documentation > > The previously PDF-only Potential Actions document is now on the site in > HTML: > > http://schema.org/docs/actions.html > > 4. Adopted some markup fixes from Stephane Corlosquet (thanks!) > > https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/71 > > 5. Improved consistency of encoding / associatedMedia description > (thanks Dan Scott!) > > https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/35 > > 6. Updated some out-of-date sections of the FAQ: it now mentions > Yandex appropriately, acknowledges that there's life beyond Microdata > (i.e. RDFa, JSON-LD), and doesn't talk about "version 0.9 draft" any > more. > > https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/69 > > Thanks all :) > > Dan > >
Received on Monday, 28 July 2014 20:21:00 UTC