- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:11:05 +0100
- To: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Cc: Tyler Shuster <tyler.herrshuster@gmail.com>, SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Jan 2, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
> I suppose you could use itemtype="Product Service" _and_
> additionalType="http://www.productontology.org/id/Computer_repair" if
> you wanted to use be as specific as possible within schema.org vocab
> for those processors that might be limited to only understanding
> schema.org, for whatever reason, while adding precision for those
> processors that also understand ProductOntology or other
> vocabularies...
>
Yes, that is how I would model this, too. A product can be a service, since being a product is a role that an object can take. So you can combine http://schema.org with basically any other type from schema.org, namely Place, Organization, CreativeWork, etc.
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 18:11:37 UTC