- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:32:26 +0000
- To: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Thanks! I think we're long overdue to handle courses at schema.org, and there are probably some other proposals floating around in the public-vocabs or LRMI list archives. One thought I had is to model course-describing pages directly, rather than debate whether a course is a kind of intangible, an extended event, a sort of Service etc etc. Maybe a good way to make these choices more concrete would be to find a few candidate sites (ideally ones that would adopt the markup) and take a look at their structure... Dan On 19 February 2014 21:46, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote: > Objectives: > Describe courses offered through EducationalOrganization s > Support searches like "A course that covers linked data in the USA" > > Existing: > > Thing > Organization > EducationalOrganization > CollegeOrUniversity > http://schema.org/CollegeOrUniversity > > LRMI: > Types: "AlignmentObject" > http://schema.org/AlignmentObject > > Properties: http://www.lrmi.net/the-specification > educationalRole, educationalAlignment, educationalUse > > Proposal: > Thing > Intangible > Course[OfStudy?] > PhysicalCourse (?) > OnlineCourse > > > Next Steps: > Gather feedback on appropriate properties > Should 'subjects' or 'topicsCovered' be freetext and/or URIs? > > Identify and work with LRMI expertise > Is there a more intuitive way to describe a 'Course' with LRMI? > What properties of Course would be good to have? > educationalRole, > educationalAlignment > > > Write a Proposal: > Someone else may be more qualified to craft a Schema.org proposal: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals > > -- > Wes Turner > http://westurner.github.io/ >
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 22:32:54 UTC