W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2014

Re: search client

From: Mark Harrison <mark.harrison@cantab.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:41:15 +0100
Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
Message-Id: <BF1BB4B7-AAE4-432A-BC5A-8C6EC47868AA@cantab.net>
To: Dave Caroline <dave.thearchivist@gmail.com>, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhmccullough@att.net>
I'm no expert in mind-reading but perhaps Dick McCullough was asking whether it is possible for a client to ask the major search engines using SPARQL (or even a simplified version of SPARQL) and express their query using predicates and classes from schema.org in order to find resources and documents containing those assertions - i.e. to use schema.org not only for publishing Linked Data but also for querying it via regular search engines.

For a while there was OpenKnowledgeGraph, which provided a SPARQL endpoint - until it closed down.  
Freebase also provides a SPARQL endpoint, although the predicates appear not to be those from schema.org

There is a discussion here https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/infovore-basekb/Dy9T3aI7ZLw
about the possibility of mapping terms from schema.org to Freebase predicates.

I hope this helps!

Best wishes,

- Mark

On 29 Aug 2014, at 08:24, Dave Caroline <dave.thearchivist@gmail.com> wrote:

> You seem confused about who does what in searching.
> How should schema.org read your mind, it is not its job
> The client asks the search engines
> Dave Caroline
> On 28/08/2014, Richard H. McCullough <rhmccullough@att.net> wrote:
>> As a search client, I would like to use schema.org to tell the search
>> engine
>> what I am searching for.  Is that now possible?
>> Dick McCullough
>> Context Knowledge Systems
>> What is your view?
Received on Friday, 29 August 2014 08:41:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:34 UTC