Re: When to use UserComments rather than Comment class?

Le 17/03/2014 12:33, Dan Brickley a écrit :
> On 17 March 2014 11:28, George Gooding <george@nettsentrisk.no> wrote:
>> I tried to get peoples' attention about this issue quite a while ago:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Jan/0113.html
>>
>> This part of schema.org is still broken. There is no valid way of marking up
>> comments to a blog post or article as of right now.
>
> The draft of our next release that I circulated last week
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Mar/0036.html
> addresses this as part of the changes to introduce a Question/Answer
> schema: See http://sdopending.appspot.com/comment ... so please just
> assume a 'comment' property can point to Comment now. These changes
> should be live in a matter of days.
>
> We are also working on improvements to the site that will make it
> clearer which old vocabulary is deprecated.
>
> Dan
>

Hi,

Regarding deprecation and the meaning of UserComments (which is the 
event of creating the comment if I understand well), according to 
https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/32 & Dan comment on 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Nov/0196.html , we 
should finally use the newer http://schema.org/CommentAction type instead ?

I also see there's a new http://schema.org/QAPage type, but why not 
introducing a CommentPage type as well, which would contain all the 
comments related to a Creative Work ? (http://schema.org/discussionUrl 
would point to this kind of page most of the time)

E.g : 
http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.be.com%2Fblogs%2Fandrea%2Fcommentaires%2Fprivate-category%2Fcadeaux-radins-jamais-1676949.html%23comment


Thanks,
   Jocelyn

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 07:16:38 UTC