- From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:01:02 -0500
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Thanks! This seems especially helpful and in support of "Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles" (Human Understandable and Machine-Actionable) [1] I wonder whether this schmema.org microdata encoding of MLA citation style would qualify as a new CSL citation style. [2][3] Microdata and/or RDFa output templates for Zotero would be neat. [4] [1] http://www.force11.org/datacitation [2] http://citationstyles.org/styles/style-repository/ [3] https://www.zotero.org/styles [4] https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/35992/export-to-schemaorg-rdfa-andor-microdata/ : > How would I go about adding HTML + RDFa [1] and/or HTML + Microdata [2] export templates with Schema.org classes and properties to Zotero? > > References > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/ > [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org > [4] http://schema.org/docs/full.html > [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Apr/0104.html On 4/11/14, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > Thanks Karen. > > When this gets adopted we can add a couple of examples to the SchemaBibex > Recipes and > Guidelines<http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Recipes_and_Guidelines> > section. I may defer for assistance at that time to someone with a greater > insight into citation styles than I have ;-) > > > ~Richard > > On 11 Apr 2014, at 02:57, Karen Coyle > <kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote: > > Thanks, Richard. I did a modification of the markup with the date following > the author's name (which is the APA, Turabian and Chicago style). The turtle > is below. Because of the position of the date, the publication issue is > invoked twice. If that's not a problem, then I'd suggest adding one of those > formats as well to our extended "how to use" document. > > @prefix rdfa: <http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa#> . > @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> . > @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . > > <http://rdfa.info/play/> > rdfa:usesVocabulary schema: . > _:1 > rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle; > schema:author "Carlyle, Allyson."; > schema:isPartOf _:2; > schema:isPartOf _:3; > schema:isPartOf _:4; > schema:isPartOf _:5; > schema:name """Understanding FRBR as a Conceptual Model: FRBR > and the Bibliographic Universe"""; > schema:pageStart "264"; > schema:pageEnd "273"; > schema:sameAs <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254> . > _:2 > rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue; > schema:datePublished "2006" . > _:3 > rdf:type schema:Periodical; > schema:name "Library Resources and Technical Services" . > _:4 > rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume; > schema:volumeNumber "50" . > _:5 > rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue; > schema:issueNumber "4" . > > kc > > > On 4/10/14, 11:58 PM, Wallis,Richard wrote: > An example for “/An article citation in MLA format, using a 'flat' > approach that simplifies markup by not specifying an explicit > relationship between the periodical, volume, and issue/” has now been > added to the proposal document here > <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Periodicals,_Articles_and_Multi-volume_Works#Example_3_-_An_article_citation_in_MLA_format.2C_using_a_.27flat.27_markup_approach>. > > > ~Richard > > On 9 Apr 2014, at 14:50, Wallis,Richard > <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org<mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> > <mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>> wrote: > > Coming out of a day of wall-2-wall meetings to find this list has made > the points I was going to make and formed a general consensus is great! > > So all I can add is, support to Dan’s earlier comment that the > SchemaBibex "/proposal slants toward hierarchical markup/” yet "/At > the same time, we can also support quite flat markup/" - “ /..the > proposal fills a significant gap in the schema.org<http://schema.org> > <http://schema.org/> vocabulary./” > > Plus I acknowledge that the examples in the proposal are lacking one > that demonstrates this flat approach. > > I will work with Dan to get such an example added to the proposal and > also take this into account when we add to the SchemaBibEx Recipes and > Guidelines > <https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Recipes_and_Guidelines> > section, > once it has been adopted > > Thanks to Karen for raising this and to all who contributed. > > ~Richard > > On 9 Apr 2014, at 14:14, Dan Scott > <dan@coffeecode.net<mailto:dan@coffeecode.net> > <mailto:dan@coffeecode.net>> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:48:56PM +0200, Karen Coyle wrote: > Thanks, Niklas and Dan and Adrian. > > Niklas, yours is a successful version of something that I tried > unsuccessfully - nesting all of the periodical "parts" in between > article properties. The turtle makes sense to me, even though the > RDFa is hard to grasp (but then, I'm not a machine). > > Dan, I couldn't turtle-ize yours, and the rich snippet tool appears > to be flaky and wouldn't spit out the pages section. It may be > equivalent to Niklas' - I have no idea. Sorry. > > My fault: I'm much better at RDFa than I am at microdata; I should have > prefixed http://schema.org/ to the PublicationVolume / PublicationIssue > types in my microdata example. At least that works as I meant it to in > http://linter.structured-data.org > <http://linter.structured-data.org/> and > http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller (and by the way, Gregg, you rock > for providing both of those services!) > > In any case, the core difference between Niklas's and my example is that > I did not include any nesting, because I thought flat was what you were > asking for. And yes, the Rich Snippet Tool is well-known for dropping > properties that it doesn't recognize (it complains about isPartOf and > presumably can't be bothered to complain about pageStart / pageEnd). > > Let's get this proposal adopted and put the Rich Snippet Tool to work! > > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > > > -- -- Wes Turner
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2014 18:01:30 UTC