Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization

(Sigh)

I still want (and request) a __unique_property__ on Organization or Person

(or Thing even still, because of those Twitter accounts for funny Squirrels
and the GroundHog who pops up during beginning of spring - they are not
Persons or an Organization, yet someone moderates their social accounts..so
they still have a social account)

 that holds the idea of a "social identifier".

.... not just "web identifier".

And Jarno is right, Webmasters have and are crying for a specific property
to help disambiguate between the Regular Web identifiers...and the Social
Web identifiers.  Just give them the little elves their tools already !

(love ya Kingsley, but your stretching on territory that 90% of the world
does not care about, but keep on researching !)



On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote:

> re: schema:webid :
>
> > Effect:
> >
> > It just works! Entity disambiguation is in place, data consumers
> (subject to their mindset: structured data, linked data, semantic web) can
> all work with this without any disruption or "world view"  warfare triggers.
> >
> > Why does it just work?
> >
> > 1. A webid or WebID is an HTTP URI that denotes an Agent (note: this has
> nothing to do with the WebID+TLS authentication protocol, this is simply
> about entity denotation, where the entity in question is an Agent i.e.,
> person, organization, or bot)
> >
> > 2. Using the fragment identifier implies no entity URI disambiguation
> heuristics.
> >
> > Conclusion:
> >
> > <http://schema.org/webid> is a non disruptive relationship property for
> this kind of relation i.e., one that associates an entity with its
> description document (descriptor), implicitly .
>
> I would say +1 for 'schema:webid', but then how can I link to my
> Keybase.io?
>
>


-- 
-Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>