- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:13:28 -0500
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 23:13:55 UTC
> > > Is this about how you or I (people) are associated with (or related to) > the profile pages (documents) provided by social network service providers? > If so, then owl:sameAs, 'same as', :sameAs etc., do not denote the relation > (relationship or association type) that coherently expresses the > aforementioned relationship/association. > > It's about making things easier. That's all. And I explained it well enough in the original thread. My further comments will be on the original thread still. Sorry Kingsley, but I don't like splits. -- -Thad +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 23:13:55 UTC