- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:27:40 -0700
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- CC: public-vocabs@w3.org
Alex, do you think that "non-scientific" and "scientific" can share a vocabulary? Or are the purposes too different? It seems like *measurement* itself is general enough to be usable in nearly all contexts. kc On 6/5/13 9:11 AM, Alex Milowski wrote: > I'm curious if there are any of you working on annotating scientific > measurements. Specifically, I'm looking for structured values that > would contain properties such as: > > * "the target quantity" - e.g. air temperature, luminosity, etc. > * measurement method > * SI units > * expected error > * category (e.g. surface air temperature vs atmospheric air temperature) > > Most of my examples come out of weather data but I've also been looking > at the measurements used by astronomers as well. > > In fact, the IVOA's UCD (Unified Content Descriptors) [1] is an > interesting approach to creating tuples that are backed by some kind of > scientific measurement semantics. Their approach hasn't been > translated, as far as I know, into any kind of RDF-aware schema. > > [1] http://www.ivoa.net/documents/latest/UCD.html > > -- > --Alex Milowski > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > considered." > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 16:28:09 UTC