- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 11:04:57 +0530
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SqC0XyakqTaetkboNLiw18X9O3PqHfoBuF5Zxb0xnqPWA@mail.gmail.com>
Greetings Schema.org Taskforce Just joined this list, with a couple of things in mind 1. In general, trying to learn about schema.org developments, what's new, whats happening (or not :-), in particular interested at thsi moment about what is happening in library linked data, as I am preparing a talk I ll give in the summer. if possible pls point me to archives, repositories and interesting/relevant threads where I can learn the latest 2. I am working with a team of students in India on an exercise in web information collection/publishing, and we are precisely working on temple metadata Having found that a schema already exists, http://schema.org/HinduTemple we plan to use it, however we would like to extend it ( data is missing from this schema based on our experience) How can we contribute to refine/improve this particular schema on schema.org? This for me brings up the question how the schemas are pulled together in the first place, based on what knowledge/construct/process? (Since starting the exercise I have learned about this mailing list, so I may invite some students to join here if they so wish) cheers PDM On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > And we're back. Apologies for the hiccup! > > On 5 April 2013 01:48, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > > Excuse this brief note; I'll write more in a week. We've just > > published a revision to schema.org including substantial new > > vocabulary that improves > > > > The new version is numbered 1.0a indicating that this is approaching a > > full 1.0 release but that we still have a few additions to make before > > we declare we're at a full 1.0. > > > > The 1.0a additions are considered stable, but we will fix any bugs or > > problems that implementors encounter during this 'soft release'. > > Additions include the Datasets vocabulary, LRMI for > > education/learning, technical publishing vocabulary, more vocabulary > > for describing Audiences, and some supporting utility terms for > > describing schema.org types, properties and their inter-relationships. > > > > I won't attempt here to list everyone who contributed to these new > > additions (it deserves a blog post), but thanks for all your hard work > > and patience. There are plenty more additions still in the pipeline > > and I look forward to following this announcement with work towards a > > 1.0b update. In the meantime please share any feedback, issues etc on > > the WebSchemas and LRMI lists. > > > > http://schema.org/docs/full.html as always has pointers to the full > vocabulary. > > For LRMI, http://schema.org/AlignmentObject is the main type, > > alongside additions to http://schema.org/CreativeWork > > For Datasets, we added http://schema.org/Dataset and some nearby > types... > > > > Dan > >
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2013 05:35:25 UTC