W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2013

Re: schema.org 1.0a revision: LRMI, Datasets, Audience, Technical Publishing vocabulary and more.

From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 11:04:57 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMXe=SqC0XyakqTaetkboNLiw18X9O3PqHfoBuF5Zxb0xnqPWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Greetings Schema.org Taskforce

Just joined this list, with a couple of things in mind

1. In general, trying to learn about schema.org developments, what's new,
whats happening (or not :-), in particular interested at thsi moment about
 what is happening in library linked data, as I am preparing a talk I ll
give in the summer.
if possible pls point me to archives, repositories and interesting/relevant
threads
where I can learn the latest

2.

I am working with a team of students in India on an exercise in web
information collection/publishing, and we are precisely working on temple
metadata

Having found that a schema already exists,
http://schema.org/HinduTemple
we plan to use it, however we
would like to extend it ( data is missing from this schema based on our
experience) How can we contribute to refine/improve this particular schema
on schema.org?

This for me brings up the question how  the schemas are pulled together in
the first place, based on what knowledge/construct/process?

(Since starting the exercise I have learned about this mailing list, so I
may invite some students to join here if they so wish)


cheers

PDM


On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> And we're back. Apologies for the hiccup!
>
> On 5 April 2013 01:48, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> > Excuse this brief note; I'll write more in a week. We've just
> > published a revision to schema.org including substantial new
> > vocabulary that improves
> >
> > The new version is numbered 1.0a indicating that this is approaching a
> > full 1.0 release but that we still have a few additions to make before
> > we declare we're at a full 1.0.
> >
> > The 1.0a additions are considered stable, but we will fix any bugs or
> > problems that implementors encounter during this 'soft release'.
> > Additions include the Datasets vocabulary, LRMI for
> > education/learning, technical publishing vocabulary, more vocabulary
> > for describing Audiences, and some supporting utility terms for
> > describing schema.org types, properties and their inter-relationships.
> >
> > I won't attempt here to list everyone who contributed to these new
> > additions (it deserves a blog post), but thanks for all your hard work
> > and patience. There are plenty more additions still in the pipeline
> > and I look forward to following this announcement with work towards a
> > 1.0b update. In the meantime please share any feedback, issues etc on
> > the WebSchemas and LRMI lists.
> >
> > http://schema.org/docs/full.html as always has pointers to the full
> vocabulary.
> > For LRMI, http://schema.org/AlignmentObject is the main type,
> > alongside additions to http://schema.org/CreativeWork
> > For Datasets, we added http://schema.org/Dataset and some nearby
> types...
> >
> > Dan
>
>
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2013 05:35:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:48:54 UTC