RE: new itemscope or not?

I love how LC upgraded LCCNs to Linked Data without buying into the myth
that they identified "cards" or "records" or "controlled headings".
(Thanks and a lift of the lynch lid to Ed!)

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ed.summers@gmail.com [mailto:ed.summers@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Ed Summers
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:34 PM
> To: Dawson, Laura
> Cc: Jeni Tennison; Thad Guidry; public-vocabs@w3.org
> Subject: Re: new itemscope or not?
> 
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Dawson, Laura
<Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>
> wrote:
> > So many identifiers are not URLs. They can be related to URLs (as
> > DOIs) but they are not URLs themselves.
> 
> Yes, but most are can be expressed as URIs.
> 
> //Ed
>

Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 23:09:06 UTC