- From: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:17:54 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACWrOGYF+iV831UZaf0QBzN_ugg8-KakZT1Sa=HquW5QzETBTQ@mail.gmail.com>
I've added all the URLs on this thread to the "selected related work" section of the Activity/Action proposal. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:47, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > On 20 April 2012 21:39, Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com> wrote: > > Makes sense Danny. Please continue to monitor discussion on > Action/Activity > > to make sure they'll be extensible for your use case. Others have > contacted > > me offline about their desire to represent "subtasks," and the Event > > Ontology that Bob mentioned in this thread also seems to argue for having > > some kind of subEvent/subActivity relation available. > > Just to drop a quick link in here - in the NoTube EU project (which I > worked on until recently too) we had a need to reflect activity > streams model into RDF. This was for some work on generating TV > recommendations based on social Web activities. There's a draft spec > at http://xmlns.notu.be/aair/ > > I think the details matter less than that several of us converged on a > similar design space. I take this as a good sign... > > Enjoy your weekends, > > cheers, > > Dan >
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 20:18:44 UTC