- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:47:43 +0200
- To: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org
On 20 April 2012 21:39, Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com> wrote: > Makes sense Danny. Please continue to monitor discussion on Action/Activity > to make sure they'll be extensible for your use case. Others have contacted > me offline about their desire to represent "subtasks," and the Event > Ontology that Bob mentioned in this thread also seems to argue for having > some kind of subEvent/subActivity relation available. Just to drop a quick link in here - in the NoTube EU project (which I worked on until recently too) we had a need to reflect activity streams model into RDF. This was for some work on generating TV recommendations based on social Web activities. There's a draft spec at http://xmlns.notu.be/aair/ I think the details matter less than that several of us converged on a similar design space. I take this as a good sign... Enjoy your weekends, cheers, Dan
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 19:48:14 UTC