- From: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:52:05 +0200
- To: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, lrmi@googlegroups.com
- Message-ID: <4F8C2405.9080801@tu-cottbus.de>
I would say describing a page is to describe a CreativeWork/WebPage. As @url is the page itself I would use @about to store the URL of the creative content that is described. -Adrian Giurca On 4/16/2012 3:41 PM, Phil Barker wrote: > Hello all, > I'm working on some examples for marking up educational/learning > resources using schema.org (including the proposed LRMI properties). > There are quite a lot of catalogue-like services which provide some of > the best descriptions for learning resources without actually > providing the resource itself. They are simply there to help people > find learning resources held elsewhere. A fairly typical example would > be the National Science Digital Library, with pages like > http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T > > I can see two options for marking up these pages, 1. add schema.org > microdata to describe the webpage as it is and say that it refers to > something elsewhere which is a learning resource with certain > characteristics, or 2. just add microdata to describe the learning > resource. I'ld be interested in any advice/opinions/speculation on > which might be the best approach, especially if you think there are > any pitfalls to either approach. > > For the NSDL example, the first approach would give a description > along the lines of: > > Item > *Type:* http://schema.org/webpage > url = http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T > provider = /Item/( 1 ) > publisher = /Item/( 1 ) > creator = /Item/( 1 ) > about = /Item/( 2 ) > > Item 1 > *Type:* http://www.pjjk.net/organization > name = National Science Digital Library > url = http://nsdl.org/ > > Item 2 > *Type:* http://schema.org/creativework > name = Learning About Ratios: A Sandwich Study > url = > http://www.cteonline.org/portal/default/Resources/Viewer/ResourceViewer?action=2&resid=227315 > > learningresourcetype = Instructional Material > creator = ... > about = ... > ...etc > > > The second would mark up the page at > http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T to produce: > > Item > *Type:* http://schema.org/creativework > name = Learning About Ratios: A Sandwich Study > url = > http://www.cteonline.org/portal/default/Resources/Viewer/ResourceViewer?action=2&resid=227315 > > learningresourcetype = Instructional Material > creator = ... > about = ... > ....etc > > > As I see it, the first approach has some advantages since it > acknowledges that the page being marked up is in itself a useful > resource, and allows us to say some fairly sophisticated things like > the description on the NSDL page and the "learning about ratios" > resource being available from different people (maybe under different > licenses etc.) However it might be over-sophisticated and the big > search engines might just ignore the information about the learning > resource. Incidentally, if this approach does have any merit, is > "about" the right relationship between the two resources? > > The second approach has the advantage of being straightforward, but I > wonder whether search engines might not deprecate in some way pages > that claim a URL other than their own? > > > Any comments welcome, thanks. > > Phil > -- > <http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times Scottish University of the > Year 2011-2012.* > > We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to > join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary > themes. Please see > > http://www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders > > for further information and how to apply. > > Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity > number SC000278.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 13:52:51 UTC