- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:03:04 +0100
- To: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, lrmi@googlegroups.com
- Message-ID: <4F8C2698.3000001@hw.ac.uk>
[slight change to subject line to be more generally correct] Thanks Adrian, that would suggest the first approach I gave. Is @url being the page itself (I assume the page being marked-up) a general principle for microdata or schema.org? Phil On 16/04/2012 14:52, Adrian Giurca wrote: > I would say describing a page is to describe a CreativeWork/WebPage. > As @url is the page itself I would use @about to store the URL of the > creative content that is described. > > -Adrian Giurca > > On 4/16/2012 3:41 PM, Phil Barker wrote: >> Hello all, >> I'm working on some examples for marking up educational/learning >> resources using schema.org (including the proposed LRMI properties). >> There are quite a lot of catalogue-like services which provide some >> of the best descriptions for learning resources without actually >> providing the resource itself. They are simply there to help people >> find learning resources held elsewhere. A fairly typical example >> would be the National Science Digital Library, with pages like >> http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T >> >> I can see two options for marking up these pages, 1. add schema.org >> microdata to describe the webpage as it is and say that it refers to >> something elsewhere which is a learning resource with certain >> characteristics, or 2. just add microdata to describe the learning >> resource. I'ld be interested in any advice/opinions/speculation on >> which might be the best approach, especially if you think there are >> any pitfalls to either approach. >> >> For the NSDL example, the first approach would give a description >> along the lines of: >> >> Item >> *Type:* http://schema.org/webpage >> url = http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T >> provider = /Item/( 1 ) >> publisher = /Item/( 1 ) >> creator = /Item/( 1 ) >> about = /Item/( 2 ) >> >> Item 1 >> *Type:* http://www.pjjk.net/organization >> name = National Science Digital Library >> url = http://nsdl.org/ >> >> Item 2 >> *Type:* http://schema.org/creativework >> name = Learning About Ratios: A Sandwich Study >> url = >> http://www.cteonline.org/portal/default/Resources/Viewer/ResourceViewer?action=2&resid=227315 >> >> learningresourcetype = Instructional Material >> creator = ... >> about = ... >> ...etc >> >> >> The second would mark up the page at >> http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T to produce: >> >> Item >> *Type:* http://schema.org/creativework >> name = Learning About Ratios: A Sandwich Study >> url = >> http://www.cteonline.org/portal/default/Resources/Viewer/ResourceViewer?action=2&resid=227315 >> >> learningresourcetype = Instructional Material >> creator = ... >> about = ... >> ....etc >> >> >> As I see it, the first approach has some advantages since it >> acknowledges that the page being marked up is in itself a useful >> resource, and allows us to say some fairly sophisticated things like >> the description on the NSDL page and the "learning about ratios" >> resource being available from different people (maybe under different >> licenses etc.) However it might be over-sophisticated and the big >> search engines might just ignore the information about the learning >> resource. Incidentally, if this approach does have any merit, is >> "about" the right relationship between the two resources? >> >> The second approach has the advantage of being straightforward, but I >> wonder whether search engines might not deprecate in some way pages >> that claim a URL other than their own? >> >> >> Any comments welcome, thanks. >> >> Phil >> -- >> <http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times Scottish University of >> the Year 2011-2012.* >> >> We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to >> join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary >> themes. Please see >> >> http://www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders >> >> for further information and how to apply. >> >> Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity >> number SC000278. > -- <http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/> Please note new email address: phil.barker@hw.ac.uk -- Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2011-2012 We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes. Please see http://www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how to apply. Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC000278.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 14:02:29 UTC