- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:41:10 +0100
- To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, lrmi@googlegroups.com
- Message-ID: <4F8C2176.2040602@hw.ac.uk>
Hello all,
I'm working on some examples for marking up educational/learning
resources using schema.org (including the proposed LRMI properties).
There are quite a lot of catalogue-like services which provide some of
the best descriptions for learning resources without actually providing
the resource itself. They are simply there to help people find learning
resources held elsewhere. A fairly typical example would be the National
Science Digital Library, with pages like
http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T
I can see two options for marking up these pages, 1. add schema.org
microdata to describe the webpage as it is and say that it refers to
something elsewhere which is a learning resource with certain
characteristics, or 2. just add microdata to describe the learning
resource. I'ld be interested in any advice/opinions/speculation on
which might be the best approach, especially if you think there are any
pitfalls to either approach.
For the NSDL example, the first approach would give a description along
the lines of:
Item
*Type:* http://schema.org/webpage
url = http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T
provider = /Item/( 1 )
publisher = /Item/( 1 )
creator = /Item/( 1 )
about = /Item/( 2 )
Item 1
*Type:* http://www.pjjk.net/organization
name = National Science Digital Library
url = http://nsdl.org/
Item 2
*Type:* http://schema.org/creativework
name = Learning About Ratios: A Sandwich Study
url =
http://www.cteonline.org/portal/default/Resources/Viewer/ResourceViewer?action=2&resid=227315
learningresourcetype = Instructional Material
creator = ...
about = ...
...etc
The second would mark up the page at
http://nsdl.org/search/resource/2200/20110414163807295T to produce:
Item
*Type:* http://schema.org/creativework
name = Learning About Ratios: A Sandwich Study
url =
http://www.cteonline.org/portal/default/Resources/Viewer/ResourceViewer?action=2&resid=227315
learningresourcetype = Instructional Material
creator = ...
about = ...
....etc
As I see it, the first approach has some advantages since it
acknowledges that the page being marked up is in itself a useful
resource, and allows us to say some fairly sophisticated things like the
description on the NSDL page and the "learning about ratios" resource
being available from different people (maybe under different licenses
etc.) However it might be over-sophisticated and the big search engines
might just ignore the information about the learning resource.
Incidentally, if this approach does have any merit, is "about" the right
relationship between the two resources?
The second approach has the advantage of being straightforward, but I
wonder whether search engines might not deprecate in some way pages that
claim a URL other than their own?
Any comments welcome, thanks.
Phil
--
<http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/>
--
Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times
Scottish University of the Year 2011-2012
We invite research leaders and ambitious early career
researchers to join us in leading and driving research
in key inter-disciplinary themes. Please see
http://www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders
for further information and how to apply.
Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 13:40:36 UTC