- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:05:44 +0200
- To: Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "public-vision-newstd@w3.org" <public-vision-newstd@w3.org>
Le mercredi 16 juin 2010 à 15:56 +0000, Michael Champion a écrit : > here is my strawman proposal for how W3C could address the problem > this TF is focused on: > > W3C host something like a specialized version of "Google/Yahoo/Live > Groups with an IPR policy" to support the larger community of those > who are thinking about and prototyping formats, protocols, APIs, > tests, etc. to improve the Web experience. There would be no mandate > that the work not compete with other W3C efforts, and participants > would be offered a menu of IPR policy alternatives under which they > could operate rather than being forced to adopt to a single predefined > IPR policy. One would almost certainly be the Open Web Foundation > agreement. Likewise there would be no mandate that the completed work > advance to standardization via the W3C; presumably the W3C brand and > community would tend to steer the most useful results toward > Recommendation track. W3C staff (or volunteers) would offer *minimal* > moderation to make sure that the group is doing work that is plausibly > useful to the Web, and not a home for malware/phishers/etc. +1 on working on a concrete plan, and +1 to start with something along that line; it would need to be compared/merged with the other proposals on the table: http://www.w3.org/2010/04/w3c-vision-public/wiki/Newstd#References (where I've added Mike's message) Dom
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 16:05:53 UTC