- From: Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 03:39:26 +0200
- To: dorothyg <jhdorothyg2003@yahoo.com>
- Cc: public-veres-one@w3.org, Adam Lake <alake@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-ID: <CAM_BU4bxUqt2Y67Kp5EcWrC_i8BXwSWTj=6FKsJX-0ESQG=rxg@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, 21:05 dorothyg, <jhdorothyg2003@yahoo.com> wrote: > +1 > On Friday, 24 August 2018, 15:22:41 GMT, Adam Lake < > alake@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > > Dear Anriette, Dorothy, and Mishi, > > Please reply to this email, to the mailing list, with your vote on the > proposal to incorporate Veres One as a nonprofit in Canada. > > Kind Regards, > > Adam > > On 8/17/2018 12:35 PM, Adam Lake wrote: > > *Greetings Veres One Community Group,* > > Given the consensus on the mailing list and the end of the time period for > community input on the incorporation proposal, I would like to call for a > vote by the members-to-be of the Board of Governors on the following > proposal: > > PROPOSAL: Incorporate the Veres One Foundation as a non-profit in Canada. > > Members-to-be of the Board of Governors, please reply with a +/- 1 to this > email with your vote on the proposal. > > Details on this vote follow. > > We currently have six members-to-be that have agreed to serve on the Board > of Governors <https://veres.one/about/> with a seventh and final to be > announced and added later next month. I should note that because the > Foundation doesn’t exist yet, and because the Board of Governors can’t be > officially formed until the Foundation exists, that this is more of a vote > in spirit than a legally binding vote. Digital Bazaar continues to hold all > legal and financial liability in the formation of the Veres One Foundation > until such a time as the Board of Governors is officially and legally in > place. > > Below is the specific proposal that was discussed on the mailing list > including background information. The proposal (above) to be voted on has > been edited to include only the essential information: > > UPDATED PROPOSAL: After doing more research into the various country > options for incorporation my proposal has changed somewhat. I propose that > we incorporate in Canada to start with and leave the next country of > incorporation more open ended. Canada may end up being a good long term > home for the Veres One Foundation. The CG and the Board can decide where, > when, and if the Veres One Foundation should migrate to another > jurisdiction at a later date.” > > The entire discussion thread can be found in the mailing list archives: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-veres-one/2018Aug/thread.html > > I believe there has been some good discussion on the proposal and that we > have consensus (see tally below) to move forward with a vote. > > Since this is our first proposal and vote as a community I would like to > remind everyone that the function of the Board of Governors (Board members > may also be CG members) is to act as guardians of the mission > <https://veres.one/summary/> and not to favor their preferred proposals. > The Board of Governors are tasked with first determining whether consensus > has indeed been achieved as part of the “consideration” phase of the decision > making process <https://veres.one/network/governance/>and then pass the > proposal unless it endangers the Veres One Mission. The final decision is > determined by a simple majority vote. Governors who reject proposals are > expected to provide an explanation to the Veres One Community Group > > Tally of responses to the Proposal: > > Ten -- +1 > > Two -- 0 > > Zero -- -1 > > More specifically: > > Anriette Esterhuysen: +1 > > Matt Stone: +1 “+1 on the basis of Adam's thorough analysis and > recommendation. Personally I'm glad we're not trying to go to Switzerland > right now (or maybe ever). When I hear of "Swiss neutrality" in a topic > like this I feel a slight eye-roll come on. Their marketing is good. Bose > speakers anyone?” > > Dorothy Gordon: +1 "I hope we can come to a decision soon. I go with > Canada now, Estonia would be my second choice." Dorothy, apologies for > missing you on the first tally. > > Markus Sabadello: +1 Canada makes sense I think, even though I have to > admit I also liked the Swiss option :) > > Kilnam Chon: “Canada sounds better than others” > > Kaliya Young: “Canada seems like the best option. They (the Canadians) > are doing really good identity work too.” > > Joe Andrieu: +1, “Canada is alright” > > Manu Sporny: +1, agreed. “The country has a fairly excellent track record > wrt. > > identity work, the government is progressive wrt. Privacy…” > > Dave Longley: +1 > > Adam Lake: +1 > > Melvin Carvalho: 0 “Not a stakeholder in this, but Estonia sounds like an > exciting option” > > Christopher Allen: 0, Abstain > > -- > Adam Lake > Director, Business Development > Digital Bazaar > Veres.io > 540-285-0083 > > > -- > Adam Lake > Director, Business Development > Digital Bazaar > Veres.io > 540-285-0083 > >
Received on Monday, 27 August 2018 18:57:10 UTC