- From: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:36:54 -0700
- To: Adam Lake <alake@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-veres-one@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2018 18:37:55 UTC
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:17 AM Adam Lake <alake@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > *Christopher Allen*: 0, Abstain > To be clear, I am abstaining as I don’t believe the best option is either a non-profit or foundation. There are other ways to demonstrate fiduciary responsibility and benefit to the community. The tax issues can also be addressed other ways. My personal experience with both non-profits and foundations is that they are often not worth the trouble unless there are significant individual patrons that wish to write off donations in their country of taxation, which I don’t believe is applicable to us — corporations can also write off expenses. The regulatory requirements for these entities are also burdensome and limit types of governance and changes to governance models which I believe are evolving right now. I abstained as feels to me that the decision as already been made that you must form a non-profit or foundation, without sufficiently exploring options for a benefit corp with strong transparent governance, and dealing with tax issues other ways. but “perfection is the enemy of the good” and if the team largely wants to go the “traditional” way I don’t want to block. — Christopher Allen
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2018 18:37:55 UTC