Re: Deprecation of termsOfUse in VCDM v2.0

Hi,

Happy to hear!

With Symeon we’ll try to provide examples for all the cases in the following 2 days (by Tuesday EOD).

BR, Alen

> On 21 Jul 2024, at 15:47, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 1:17 AM Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si> wrote:
>> I believe this case is currently not defined in the specs.
> 
> Thank  you for the documentation and links Alen, speaking as an
> Editor, I believe that what you have provided makes a solid case for
> keeping the section in the specification. I'll try to drive consensus
> in the WG around that goal.
> 
> At a quick glance, I was struggling to find a concrete example that we
> could include in the specification and while I could try to construct
> one from the JSON Schema provided, I'd rather depend on EBSI to
> provide a correct VCDM v2 example. Perhaps I missed an example in the
> documentation you provided?
> 
> That said, the direction the WG needs to take feels clear at this
> point. We should close PR 1498 and, instead, focus on updating the
> Terms of Use section to use an EBSI TrustFrameworkPolicy or
> AccreditationPolicy example. I'll raise a PR and tag you so you can
> provide further guidance.
> 
> Apologies for interrupting your vacation; you don't need to respond
> until you get back, now that we have a direction we have a month or so
> to finalize the text.
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2024 04:10:03 UTC