- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:47:23 -0400
- To: Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si>
- Cc: YATES John <John.YATES@ext.ec.europa.eu>, Symeon.LAMPADARIOS@ext.ec.europa.eu, W3C Verifiable Credentials Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 1:17 AM Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si> wrote: > I believe this case is currently not defined in the specs. Thank you for the documentation and links Alen, speaking as an Editor, I believe that what you have provided makes a solid case for keeping the section in the specification. I'll try to drive consensus in the WG around that goal. At a quick glance, I was struggling to find a concrete example that we could include in the specification and while I could try to construct one from the JSON Schema provided, I'd rather depend on EBSI to provide a correct VCDM v2 example. Perhaps I missed an example in the documentation you provided? That said, the direction the WG needs to take feels clear at this point. We should close PR 1498 and, instead, focus on updating the Terms of Use section to use an EBSI TrustFrameworkPolicy or AccreditationPolicy example. I'll raise a PR and tag you so you can provide further guidance. Apologies for interrupting your vacation; you don't need to respond until you get back, now that we have a direction we have a month or so to finalize the text. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Sunday, 21 July 2024 13:48:05 UTC