Re: Deprecation of termsOfUse in VCDM v2.0

Hello, following up on this.
 Can we still look forward to getting those examples?

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:11 PM Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Happy to hear!
>
> With Symeon we’ll try to provide examples for all the cases in the
> following 2 days (by Tuesday EOD).
>
> BR, Alen
>
> > On 21 Jul 2024, at 15:47, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 1:17 AM Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si>
> wrote:
> >> I believe this case is currently not defined in the specs.
> >
> > Thank  you for the documentation and links Alen, speaking as an
> > Editor, I believe that what you have provided makes a solid case for
> > keeping the section in the specification. I'll try to drive consensus
> > in the WG around that goal.
> >
> > At a quick glance, I was struggling to find a concrete example that we
> > could include in the specification and while I could try to construct
> > one from the JSON Schema provided, I'd rather depend on EBSI to
> > provide a correct VCDM v2 example. Perhaps I missed an example in the
> > documentation you provided?
> >
> > That said, the direction the WG needs to take feels clear at this
> > point. We should close PR 1498 and, instead, focus on updating the
> > Terms of Use section to use an EBSI TrustFrameworkPolicy or
> > AccreditationPolicy example. I'll raise a PR and tag you so you can
> > provide further guidance.
> >
> > Apologies for interrupting your vacation; you don't need to respond
> > until you get back, now that we have a direction we have a month or so
> > to finalize the text.
> >
> > -- manu
> >
> > --
> > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 29 July 2024 20:21:32 UTC