- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 16:09:16 -0400
- To: "sancho.canela@externos.correo.gob.es" <sancho.canela@externos.correo.gob.es>
- Cc: "public-vc-wg@w3.org" <public-vc-wg@w3.org>, "ivan@w3.org" <ivan@w3.org>, "brent.zundel@mesur.io" <brent.zundel@mesur.io>, RAUL ITURBE TORRE <raul.iturbe@digital.gob.es>, MARIA CARMEN BARRERA FUERTES <mariacarmen.barrera@digital.gob.es>
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 1:59 PM sancho.canela@externos.correo.gob.es <sancho.canela@externos.correo.gob.es> wrote: > If possible, we would like to know the timeline for Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0 to move from the W3C Candidate Recommendation Draft to the W3C recommendation. Hi Sancho, it's wonderful to hear of your interest in VCDM v2.0. The specification is considered stable enough to be implemented in a pilot / non-production capacity right now. We are down to zero issues and do not expect significant changes, or even minor changes that would affect an implementation, at this point in time. If everything goes according to plan, we plan to move to Proposed Recommendation by the end of October with a W3C Recommendation to follow shortly thereafter (by the end of the year). That said, we know of several large governments that are already recommending the switch to VC v2.0 for their vendors and implementers. At this point, my recommendation as the Editor for those specifications, is to target future deployments for VCDM v2.0. I hope that answers your question; let us know if we can further help in any way. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Sunday, 11 August 2024 20:09:57 UTC