Re: Deprecation of termsOfUse in VCDM v2.0 from Alen Horvat on 2024-08-09 (public-vc-wg@w3.org from August 2024)

From: Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 09:32:32 +0000
To: David Ammouial <david.ammouial@nttdata.com>
Cc: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, LAMPADARIOS Symeon <Symeon.LAMPADARIOS@ext.ec.europa.eu>, W3C Verifiable Credentials Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <50854B92-49DF-4C34-807D-17A6AAC9B546@netis.si>

Correct,

These are 2 different principles. Accreditation tells you that an issuer is recognised to issue the VC; 2nd is about the RP/Verifier proofing they are authorised (according to regulation/…) to request a given VC.

Hope this helps.

BR, Alen

> On 9 Aug 2024, at 11:20, David Ammouial <david.ammouial@nttdata.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m not sure to understand the link between a holder or a verifier being authorised to request a VC, and the accreditation of the issuer to issue the VC. If I’m not mistaken, those would be two unrelated things.
>

Received on Friday, 9 August 2024 09:34:11 UTC