- From: José Manuel Cantera Fonseca <jmcf@tid.es>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:19:24 +0100
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-uwa@w3.org
According to [1] they have extended the W3C's Geo2003 vocabulary to include not only points but other geometric shapes that can represent where something is It think we need to liaise with this people, in order to progress that kind of ontology as something recommended by the W3C What do you think? Best Regards [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/#owl Dave Raggett escribió: > Thanks for the pointers. A quick glance at their ontology suggests > that it focuses on spatial relationships rather than locations, and as > such would complement our work on basic location data, see > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uwa/2007Nov/0004.html > > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Regarding location, it could be worth having a look at the reports >> [1] [2] produced by the Geospatial Incubator Group that recently >> ended. Also, it could be worth knowing more about the plans of the >> people involved in that group with respect to continuing the work >> >> Best Regards >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/ >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont/
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 12:25:30 UTC