Re: Including location, calendar and contact data in the ontology

I completely agree with the need to liaise with them, The XG has 
closed, but we should be able to find a to contact them.

  Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca wrote:

> According to [1] they have extended the W3C's Geo2003 vocabulary 
> to include not only points but other geometric shapes that can 
> represent where something is
>
> It think we need to liaise with this people, in order to progress 
> that kind of ontology as something recommended by the W3C What do 
> you think?
>
> Best Regards
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/#owl
>
> Dave Raggett escribió:
>> Thanks for the pointers. A quick glance at their ontology suggests that it 
>> focuses on spatial relationships rather than locations, and as such would 
>> complement our work on basic location data, see
>>
>>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uwa/2007Nov/0004.html
>> 
>>
>>  Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>> 
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Regarding location, it could be worth having a look at the reports [1] [2] 
>>> produced by the Geospatial Incubator Group that recently ended. Also, it 
>>> could be worth knowing more about the plans of the people involved in that 
>>> group with respect to continuing the work
>>> 
>>> Best Regards
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont/
>
>
>
>