- From: Max Froumentin <max@lapin-bleu.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:40:41 +0100
- To: "Smith, Kevin, VF-Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
- Cc: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, public-uwa@w3.org
Hi all, Smith, Kevin, VF-Group wrote: > Of course, > we can continue with DIAL which has great merits when aligned with the > IDEAL datatypes, but I can see that now becoming more of a CMS/device > aware engine language, with this XSLT approach providing a quick, > modular add-on to existing content markup. Indeed, the separation of concerns is the number 1 objection to DISelect: if you see content adaptation as styling, then you'll see DISelect as an heresy and will instead propose a content/style separation à la CSS, but server style. (I don't think that the question whether the engine is XSLT or any other language is particularly relevant here.) Both mechanisms are so radically different that it's hard to see how the "separated" approach could be explored in DISelect, other than to mention it exists. As for Dave's original question about pagination, I'm not sure how an XPath function would work. Dave, could you send an example or two? One way of doing it without a function is to enable pagination URI parameters, like ?page=. Then when the browser requests http://www.example.com, then the server which has decided to paginate returns the first page of HTML, including a link to http://www.example.com/?page=2. That seems to do the trick. Max.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 20:40:58 UTC