- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:51:23 +0900
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
- Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, public-uri-cg@w3.org
[fixed address to uri-review; one comment below] At 10:04 04/05/24 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >[I'm not sure why you wrote to uri-review-request@ietf.org, >but I'm leaving it there.] > >On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 08:29, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > > My appologies if I should know the answers to these questions: > > > > 1. http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes, this is an > > *authoritative* list of *approved* URI schemes, yes? > >Yes, I believe so. > > > 2. is there an *authoritiative* procedure by which a proposed scheme > > is added to this list? > >This seems to be IETF Best Current Practice: > > "Registration Procedures for URL Scheme Names" > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2717.txt > >I don't think there's anything more authoritative. > > > 3. Is there an *authoritiative* list of *proposed* schemes that are > > undergoing this approval process? > >No; at least: I'm not aware of one. I think what would come closest to this is the IETF draft tracker at https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi. But of course it's tough to find the drafts that relate to URI scheme proposals in there. Regards, Martin. > > Thank you, and again my appologies, as I should probably know the > > answers to these questions, but I don't. > > > > --Ray >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 02:17:06 UTC