- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:04:42 -0500
- To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
- Cc: uri-review-request@ietf.org, public-uri-cg@w3.org
[I'm not sure why you wrote to uri-review-request@ietf.org, but I'm leaving it there.] On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 08:29, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > My appologies if I should know the answers to these questions: > > 1. http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes, this is an > *authoritative* list of *approved* URI schemes, yes? Yes, I believe so. > 2. is there an *authoritiative* procedure by which a proposed scheme > is added to this list? This seems to be IETF Best Current Practice: "Registration Procedures for URL Scheme Names" http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2717.txt I don't think there's anything more authoritative. > 3. Is there an *authoritiative* list of *proposed* schemes that are > undergoing this approval process? No; at least: I'm not aware of one. > Thank you, and again my appologies, as I should probably know the > answers to these questions, but I don't. > > --Ray -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 24 May 2004 11:04:54 UTC