- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:53:36 -0500
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>
- Cc: public-uri-cg@w3.org
"Expires: June 20, 2003" http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-connolly-w3c-accessible-registries-00.txt Would you please submit it again, Mark? If it's not straightforward for you to do, let me know and I'll try to remember how to do that. The relevant TAG issue is still pending... http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9 Freed took an action in March http://www.w3.org/2003/03/13-ietf-w3c.html#iana-uri but I haven't heard much about it since, and we neglected to review that action in the June meeting. http://www.w3.org/2003/06/17-w3c-ietf The next meeting of that forum is today. Meanwhile, people continue to ask... "What single, stable, and widely used name should I use to refer to the text/plain mime type?" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Oct/0081.html Michael, you mentioned "RFC 3553 (BCP 73) which recommends someting like this structure: urn:ietf:params:media-types:application:vnd.kde.kword" -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Oct/0082.html which is at odds with the impression I got from the March 2003 W3C/IETF coordination call... "draft-connolly-w3c-accessible-registries asks IANA to maintain dereferencable and persistent URIs as identifiers. Masinter: presumption is that this will be advanced as BCP." -- http://www.w3.org/2003/03/13-ietf-w3c.html#iana-uri Ah... I see you weren't at that meeting. Hmm... this URI CG hasn't had a teleconference yet, but I'm starting to see a number of motivations to put one together. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 10:53:37 UTC