- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:59:55 -0700
- To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-uri-cg@w3.org
> "Authors of specifications SHOULD avoid introducing new URI schemes when > existing schemes can be used to meet the goals of the specifications." > -- > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030627/#pr-new-scheme-expensive > > "To help parties know when they are referring to the same resource, it > follows that URI producers should be conservative about the number of > different URIs they produce for the same resource." > -- > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030627/#identifiers-comparison Since people with URI scheme proposals who want 'official' endorsement will look to the IETF and not necessarily to the 'Web Architecture' document, should there be a joint IETF/W3C activity to update the URI registration BCP and guidelines documents to include this new advice? Update 2718?
Received on Friday, 3 October 2003 02:14:04 UTC