Re: TTWG's response to I18N comment #256

Richard,

Yes but the weird thing is that I18N closed the issue before the TTWG 
discused it and resolved "Disposition agreed by WG"

Anyway, thank you for agreeing to the WG resolution.

Thierry


Le 05/09/2017 à 12:16, r12a a écrit :
> Agreement to close already given at 
> https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/256#issuecomment-323121543
> 
> ri
> 
> 
> On 05/09/2017 07:39, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>>
>> Dear Richard,
>>
>> The Timed Text Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on 
>> the Wide Review Working Draft [2] of the TTML 2.0 published on 30 june 
>> 2017. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and 
>> to send us comments!
>>
>> The Working Group's response to your comment rquesting "to provide 
>> more illustrations and examples for the ruby sections is available at 
>> [1] on Github".
>>
>> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
>> public-tt@w3.org?subject=%5BTTML2%5D if you agree with it or not 
>> before 30 Sept  2017.
>> In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific 
>> solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
>> such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity 
>> to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the 
>> Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in 
>> the W3C Recommendation Track.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> For the Timed Text Working Group,
>> Thierry Michel
>> W3C Staff Contact
>>
>>    [1] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/256
>>    [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml2-20170630/
>>
>>
>>
> 

Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 08:18:28 UTC