- From: David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 22:40:12 -0700
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMjV-Fh6b=n5Fke4grqsGRJeuJYZyq1zCkeUpY-1AVA89q2wRw@mail.gmail.com>
> Note that oblique != shear My bad. Thanks for correcting. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > Note that oblique != shear; in particular, oblique is a face name (and > thus a CSS font-style keyword) while shear is a real number that represents > an angle in the interval (-pi/2,+pi/2). So the font designer picks two > angles A,B (or maybe just one A) and generates outlines for A,B (or A and > -A), then labels those as Oblique and Reverse Oblique. In the case of > shear, the author picks an angle X (or a percentage of pi/2 as is in the > case of TTML). > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:48 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > >> OK >> >> it seems oblique has been discussed multiple times on the CSS list, see >> for example thread starting <https://lists.w3.org/Archives >> /Public/www-style/2013May/0252.html> but I am unsure of the conclusion. >> >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 16:43 , Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:36 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> > Though I am puzzled that I am not finding ‘shear’ or ‘oblique’ >> mentioned on <https://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/>? >> > >> > I would speculate that the author's of jlreq focuses on uniquely JA >> typographic features and assumed themselves it (shear) was not JA specific. >> > >> > In most page layout systems I've seen in CJK markets, this (shear) is a >> generally supported feature. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 16:33 , David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> On Oct 3, 2017, at 16:30 , David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> A real example of a TTML2 requirement that does not appear to map >> into CSS is tts:fontShear. Italics don't exist in Japanese. However, JA >> subtitles uses font shearing to simulate italics; indicating, for example, >> that the speaker is offscreen. We consider oblique text to be an essential >> JA subtitle feature that we see in the [Videotron] Lambda CAP JA subtitle >> assets that we ingest, >> > > >> > > Yes, this seems a classic case of a feature that should be generally >> supported in CSS for all (at least Japanese) text. I am puzzled that it is >> not. Is fontShear more common in, or only used in, subtitles or is it >> generally used in Japanese typography as well? >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> From the translated LambdaCAP spec: >> > >> >> > >> <image.png> >> > >> >> > >> David >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:11 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 4:52 , Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> Especially the second point leads to a much broader discussion >> about the scope of web standards like HTML+CSS. I am sure that the subtitle >> domain would be welcoming a better integration of their requirements in >> CSS. This maybe a process that needs some more time and parallel >> developments may only be a mid-term phenomenon of the conversion process. I >> am convinced that next TPAC could help to speed the process with productive >> discussions and group agreements. >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> I agree; I think the CSS group has shown themselves very responsive, >> and active in improvements. If something is needed in the way we style for >> any market, then let’s get that feature into the lingua franca we have, >> i.,e. CSS/HTML, and then it can be uniformly adopted and implemented. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> David Singer >> > >> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > David Singer >> > > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> > >> > David Singer >> > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> > >> > >> > >> >> David Singer >> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2017 05:40:36 UTC