- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 23:49:35 -0600
- To: David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cWpy8diuh5GNHpLn5t+RhMFEV8SnOPz00i4Y4G3POfnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Actually, I was responding to David Singer regarding the CSS WG having discussed oblique. While that is true, I don't know whether they have discussed shear. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:40 PM, David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com> wrote: > > Note that oblique != shear > > My bad. Thanks for correcting. > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > >> Note that oblique != shear; in particular, oblique is a face name (and >> thus a CSS font-style keyword) while shear is a real number that represents >> an angle in the interval (-pi/2,+pi/2). So the font designer picks two >> angles A,B (or maybe just one A) and generates outlines for A,B (or A and >> -A), then labels those as Oblique and Reverse Oblique. In the case of >> shear, the author picks an angle X (or a percentage of pi/2 as is in the >> case of TTML). >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:48 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> >>> OK >>> >>> it seems oblique has been discussed multiple times on the CSS list, see >>> for example thread starting <https://lists.w3.org/Archives >>> /Public/www-style/2013May/0252.html> but I am unsure of the conclusion. >>> >>> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 16:43 , Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:36 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >>> > Though I am puzzled that I am not finding ‘shear’ or ‘oblique’ >>> mentioned on <https://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/>? >>> > >>> > I would speculate that the author's of jlreq focuses on uniquely JA >>> typographic features and assumed themselves it (shear) was not JA specific. >>> > >>> > In most page layout systems I've seen in CJK markets, this (shear) is >>> a generally supported feature. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 16:33 , David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> On Oct 3, 2017, at 16:30 , David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> A real example of a TTML2 requirement that does not appear to map >>> into CSS is tts:fontShear. Italics don't exist in Japanese. However, JA >>> subtitles uses font shearing to simulate italics; indicating, for example, >>> that the speaker is offscreen. We consider oblique text to be an essential >>> JA subtitle feature that we see in the [Videotron] Lambda CAP JA subtitle >>> assets that we ingest, >>> > > >>> > > Yes, this seems a classic case of a feature that should be generally >>> supported in CSS for all (at least Japanese) text. I am puzzled that it is >>> not. Is fontShear more common in, or only used in, subtitles or is it >>> generally used in Japanese typography as well? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> From the translated LambdaCAP spec: >>> > >> >>> > >> <image.png> >>> > >> >>> > >> David >>> > >> >>> > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:11 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 4:52 , Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Especially the second point leads to a much broader discussion >>> about the scope of web standards like HTML+CSS. I am sure that the subtitle >>> domain would be welcoming a better integration of their requirements in >>> CSS. This maybe a process that needs some more time and parallel >>> developments may only be a mid-term phenomenon of the conversion process. I >>> am convinced that next TPAC could help to speed the process with productive >>> discussions and group agreements. >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> I agree; I think the CSS group has shown themselves very >>> responsive, and active in improvements. If something is needed in the way >>> we style for any market, then let’s get that feature into the lingua franca >>> we have, i.,e. CSS/HTML, and then it can be uniformly adopted and >>> implemented. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> David Singer >>> > >> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > David Singer >>> > > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >>> > >>> > David Singer >>> > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> David Singer >>> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2017 05:50:19 UTC