W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > January 2015

Re: IMSC1 Test Suite update + proposed request to DECE

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:23:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxD-X-BKQe8rC6GiN=dsESV_ebvDcEVdVsu8z-WNSq_kpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Thierry,

> Could you explain a bit more what was the methodology for listing
> all these features from IMSC1 and target the necessary associated tests ?

As briefly mentioned during the call, I have looked at extensions
defined by IMSC1 (see Annex F) (they are all mandatory), as well as
input received so far.

> Could we list the available IMSC1 implementation (public or not), to forecast the implemntation report.

I had personally been waiting until the test suite was substantially
complete before following-up with folks that had expressed interest in
contributing test results. I plan to go ahead now, and encourage
others to do so as well.

Let me know if you need additional information.

Best,

-- Pierre

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> Pierre,
>
> Thanks for adding test cases for IMSC1 with the intent of covering
> all features introduced by IMSC1 (not already present in TTML1)
>
>
> Could you explain a bit more what was the methodology for listing all these
> features from IMSC1 and target the necessary associated tests ?
>
>
> Could we list the available IMSC1 implementation (public or not), to
> forecast the implemntation report.
>
>
> Best,
>
> thierry.
>
>
> On 29/01/2015 02:48, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have added  test cases for IMSC1 [1], with the intent of covering
>> all features introduced by IMSC1.
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_Implementation_Report
>>
>> As suggested earlier, it would be good to have more details on the
>> test cases provided by DECE, e.g. it looks like
>> Solekai022_854_29_640x75_MaxSdSubtitle_v7_subtitles might be
>> exercising the limits of the HRM. I recommend composing a brief
>> liaison to DECE requesting additional details.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -- Pierre
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:24:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:20 UTC